26. February 2008 · Write a comment · Categories: Uncategorized · Tags: ,

A while back, I made a podcast (which seems to have disappeared) about how I thought Google docs weren’t quite ready for the education sphere. For some projects, that’s still true. If you need footnotes or even a lot of endnotes, Google docs won’t make that easy for you. But if, like me, most of what you write is devoid of special formatting, Google docs is great. I’ve written memos, letters of recommendation, resumes, and more. By far, the best thing about Google docs is the collaboration features. I’m able to work with people across the country easily, thanks to Google docs. There’s no waiting for someone do make changes and email them to you. If you want to jump in and add something–even at the same time as someone else–you can. I’ve used this with my student workers as well. I’ll start a help document, point them to the url and have them add to it.

I recently did a presentation in Google docs. It worked really well and I really like the chat feature, which I wish they’d add to the document area. I like the way your presentation quickly becomes a url and an embeddable presentation. With PowerPoint, there are too many steps to get to that point.

I also started using the spreadsheet function for a large data collecting project that I was working on with someone. It just wouldn’t have been practical to pass a spreadsheet back and forth via email or to work on spreadsheets separately. We needed to know who had done what at any given moment. The coolest feature they added to spreadsheets was forms. I’ve used those a lot. I’m having my students fill out information about work they’ve done via a Google form. I’ve used them for workshop sign ups and I’m using one right now to decide when to hold a workshop. It’s much faster than coding up your own web form. All the data is neatly organized into a spreadsheet.

And all the documents can be saved in standard formats–pdf, doc, ppt, xls, txt, html. And I’d recommend doing that every once in a while. Google may claim their motto is “Don’t be evil” but that doesn’t mean that mistakes might not happen (I’ve seen them on the Internets).

I love that Google docs is simple and straightforward. It doesn’t take forever to load and you can just do the basics without too much thought. Also, if I’m unable to get to my computer, I can still get to my documents. Now that I’ve gone to a laptop, this doesn’t happen too often, but I have been in meetings or in a lab where it would be a pain to go get my laptop.

Now, I’ll be fair, not everyone thinks Google docs is the best thing since sliced bread. But instead of shelling out money for Microsoft Office in order to get the advanced features, get OpenOffice. But read the original post and comments. There’s a good debate there.

26. December 2007 · Write a comment · Categories: Uncategorized · Tags: , , , ,

There’s a post this morning about how some people are complaining that Google Reader’s new feature where your shared items are shared with your contacts violates their privacy. Robert Scoble says that Google needs more granular privacy controls a la Facebook. I vote with his first response, that people need clarification on what public means.

I’ve written about this before, from the standpoint of being aware that future employers are increasingly eyeing a future employee’s online presence. Increasingly, I think, if you’re using social software, nothing is private. Search, even, is not private. Sure, there are ways to change settings so that your searches aren’t cached, your blogs aren’t pinging services, etc., but most people don’t change the defaults, so they’re just out there. And that’s okay. People just need to understand up front what it means to have so much of their online activity shared. And maybe being more open–online or elsewhere–is a good thing. Maybe it makes us more accountable for our actions. Sure, there are still some parts of our lives and our thoughts that are private, but mostly those parts aren’t being put online and if they are, I’d argue that either a) someone doesn’t understand how public the online space is; or b) they want people to know about those parts. Healthy skepticism is good, but paranoia leads us down a bad path.