Technology, Computer Science, More thoughts

There are quite a few conversations among computer science teachers and professors happening right now about the state of computer science in high schools.  I just finished a draft of my own syllabus for Intro to CS and in doing so, I spent a lot of time looking at other people’s syllabi, asking current teachers what they taught and why, and reading up on issues regarding teaching CS in high school. So this issue is in the forefront of my mind.  Not being in this role for very long, my thoughts about what to teach, whether to require CS in high school, among other things are not fully formed.  I wrote a little about this a while back, and I still hold that there’s a difference between being tech/computer savvy and being a computer scientist, I’m not entirely sure that we should privilege one over the other at the high school level.

So, let me present some other people’s thoughts before I present my own.  First, Douglas Rushkoff has a book out, called Program, or Be Programmed and wrote a brief piece for the Huffington Post about how he thinks programming should be required.  I’m in the middle of reading the, and so far, it has very little to do with programming and more to do with a more general understanding of how technology works.  For example, he talks about how Facebook is not really interested in helping you build a community of friends, but in using your information and your connections to make money.  Most of the changes they’ve made to the site over the last few months have been designed specifically to facilitate their ability to make money.

Alfred Thompson responded to Rushkoff’s ideas in this post, which has some really interesting comments, with some people who think it’s silly to suggest that we should teach programming in high school, some who think we should stick to teaching applications like Excel, and some who think we should definitely teach programming to every student.

And then, today, the CSTA issued a report, which I have only skimmed I admit, called Running on Empty: The Failure to Teach K-12 Computer Science in the Digital Age.  It’s main argument is that the skills kids need to succeed in the 21st century are CS skills and those skills are not being taught in many schools and only required in 8 states.  So, we need to work toward requiring schools to teach those skills.  Now, the CSTA curriculum for CS, which I’ve spent a lot of time with isn’t just programming.  There are lots of other computer skills in there like web design, binary, ascii code, ethics, networking, etc., so unlike Rushkoff, they’re not necessarily advocating every learn to program in high school.

Okay, so here’s my thinking.  I think everyone should know the difference between an operating system, an application, and a web browser.  I think everyone should know several different operating systems, not inside out, but at least know that there are different ones, that there are similarities between them, etc.  I think everyone should understand file structures.  Where does that file go when I save it?  I think everyone should be able to type in a web address and know what a url is.  So many hours of people’s lives are wasted searching for Google on Bing or vice versa.  I think people should know how to find out how to use applications.  Note, I did not say people should know how to use Word or Excel.  Applications change.  You should be able to feel your way around, use the help feature, or use a search engine to figure it out.

But those are not really computer science skills; however, I think it’s hard to go to the CS skills if you don’t have at least this groundwork laid.  I articulate them because I’ve spent a lot of time helping 6-8 graders and teachers alike figure out some of these things.  When someone opens up Word to find their Google Doc, something is wrong.

On the other hand, I’ve figured out a lot of what I know about using computers and doing some pretty darn complicated stuff with them without having any formal training in CS.  But why did I learn those things? Why did I figure out HTML, CSS, Flash, & PHP? Why do I know what a C: drive is, what DOS is, and how to FTP?  In part, because I was curious and I just wanted to know.  But also because the computer, back when I first started using one, was a clunky thing, and didn’t hide everything.  No, I couldn’t open up the uncompiled code, but I could see the computer’s structure by listing directories. Often to run a program, you had to type a complicated series of backslashes and directory names.  Back when I started working on the web, you could easily see the HTML and eventually, the CSS.  And back when I got email, there was no “You’ve Got Mail” sound or envelope icon to double-click.  You had to log in to a server, know the server’s name, i.e.  So, computers were more transparent and I wanted to learn more about how they worked because I could see some of that just in my basic interactions with the machine.

That interest did not translate into my learning programming at first.  I was quite content just knowing my way around a computer and its (already made for me) programs.  It got me good-paying work along the way and got me into the growing field of educational technology.  I’m leary of applying my own experience to the present day.  For one, today’s technology environment is very different from the late 80s one I grew up in. Knowing how to use a word processor or basic database program does not garner the amazement it did in 1989.  Had I been in the right place at the right time, I might have ended up at Microsoft or Google, but we didn’t have CS courses in college, much less high school.  Today, it’s still true that a student with the right CS skills could end up at a start-up (or starting their own) or at Google or Microsoft or any other company that needs programming/HCI/data analysis (almost all).  But it’s more likely now.  It’s more likely that a student will have access to a computer very early.  I didn’t even see one until I was 12 and then there were only three in our whole school.  There were none in our high school.  In college, we had VAX machines.  I took a CS class on PCs my junior year and the next year, we finally got a mac lab.  So younger students are exposed to the equipment, but what they see is a slick operating system that looks more like a tv than a computer (and sometimes it is).  How many will want to dig around on their own?  And how much more do they need to know to be able to do so?  Computers are more complicated than they were.  And the Internet has exploded and we have tiny little devices that are tiny little computers.

So I say it’s not an either/or kind of question.  Yes, we should teach people how to use their computers and the applications on them, but I believe in doing so at an abstract level as much as possible.  And yes, I think we should teach programming.  Will everyone become a programmer? No, but if we give them the opportunity, we might end up with more of them, and more women and more minorities in IT and CS fields as a result.  If we wait till college, we’ve already lost a lot of people.

I have more specifics to say about the CSTA and other curricula, but I’ll leave that for another day.

Enhanced by Zemanta

3 Replies to “Technology, Computer Science, More thoughts”

  1. Really smart post! It’s helping me think about what I want my daughter to know as she gets older, as well as the struggling gen ed students I teach in college.

  2. Intriguing.

    I took summer classes in programming (in Basic) after fourth and fifth grade, I think. All I remember now is a lot of (IF, THEN) strings and a massive struggle to program a graphic picture (in my memory, every time I’d get the curtain on the stage correct, the piano keys on the piano on the stage would go wonky). I have no idea what the current equivalent of a class like that would be. I do know that it gave me a sense of confidence that I could dig around and figure stuff out, which came in handy when the web came along and early HTML WYSIWYG forms were crap. But coding isn’t programming.

    In general, I want my kids to feel comfortable “getting their hands dirty” and digging around, but I couldn’t articulate very well why I feel that way. I mean, my dad always changed his own oil and tinkered with his own car engines (he drove beaters) but I never spare a moment’s angst over my inability to do anything under a hood. And yet, if my kids didn’t know what a C: prompt looked like or that you can actually program in Java, I’d think they were maybe a little ignorant. Why? I don’t know.

  3. I think, Jody, you feel that way because kids use computers sooo much. Knowing something about them makes them better users, I think. It means they’re less likely to fall victim to identity theft, scams, etc. It also means they can leverage that knowledge in their careers. There aren’t too many jobs out there that don’t involve the use of technology, and the better you can use it, the better you do that job. Even a lot of the faculty I know who blog or use Twitter are better at their jobs because they get more timely information–about their field, about conferences, etc.–and they make good connections with others in their field. And of course, a biologist who can program can create tools that help them analyze experiment results, visualize data, etc. Making the computer do what you want, rather than being forced to do only what it wants or can do, is a valuable skill.

Comments are closed.