17. May 2007 · Write a comment · Categories: Uncategorized · Tags: ,

Pennsylvania Voters Reject Tax Plan to Finance Schools – New York Times

I worked the polls on Tuesday and heard many comments from people (especially older people) complain about the tax increase proposed to fund schools. The saddest thing is the income tax increase would have been offset much more significantly by a property tax decrease. Now, let me just pull some logic on you. If you are on a fixed income, your taxes will not increase as long as the tax rate doesn’t increase. Your property taxes, on the other hand, increase or decrease according to the rate, but most importantly, as the property value increases. So, I’m thinking, duh, a slight income tax increase (1%) is a better deal than a potential huge property tax increase. Am I missing something?

Technorati Tags: ,

Enjoy the weekend everyone and an early Happy Mother’s Day to all of you.

I’m going to be away and occupied most of next week. When I get back, what do you all want to talk about? Leave me a note in the comments.

10. May 2007 · Write a comment · Categories: Uncategorized · Tags: ,

Where Harvard goes, others often follow. I wonder what this will mean for the ramping up of tenure requirements that has occurred at “teaching” schools. I’ll believe this when I see it, of course.
Tags: , ,

Although we’ve had many, many instances of people getting into trouble because of things they’ve posted online, we still haven’t figured out where, exactly, to draw the line. Three separate incidents in the last week have me thinking about the issue more closely. First, at my own institution, there was an incident involving a party posting on Facebook that ultimately resulted in a Student Government officer being impeached and going home for the rest of the semester, perhaps never to return. Do a Google search and you can find out a little more. Many have said that the SGA officer, though wrong, was unfairly raked over the coals even after she apologized, raising the question of how much is enough, especially when the whole incident will live on the Internet perhaps for many years to come.

Another, similar incident, was first brought to my attention by Bitch, Ph.D. and then elaborated on by Janet at Adventures in Ethics and Science. A law student who administered an online bulletin board for other law students recently had a job rescinded because he refused to curb the harassment of female law students on the board. While many feel he deserved to lose a job over the incident, some have questioned how much one’s off-work statements and actions should affect your job.

A similar incident occurred with a Millersville University student who was denied her teaching certificate because of a single MySpace photo captioned “Drunken Pirate.”

While I definitely feel that when blogging or posting online, one has to be aware that everything can be seen by current and future employers, I think employers should be a little more thoughtful about how they consider such postings. If one finds pictures of a future employee online showing him or her drunk, does that automatically eliminate them from consideration? Shouldn’t one balance that with other information? Many people get drunk on occasion and increasingly, those incidents are documented and posted, often because they want to share the rare occurrence with friends. If an employer is concerned, maybe they should call references or ask the future employee directly.

Some may respond to such incidents by only venturing online under a pseudonym or not venturing online at all, but I think increasingly, people want an online presence that’s going to include many facets of their lives and personalities. And I think eventually, employers may have to learn to sift through information about people they find online more thoughtfully.

My suggestion for the student at my own institution whose mistake lives online in the student newspaper and Facebook: control your online presence, create a blog highlighting your accomplishments, write positively and move that presence above the other one. Sure, future employers may find the old mistake living in the Internet archive, but if everything else they find is positive, it’s going to be greatly minimized and maybe not even an issue.

07. May 2007 · Write a comment · Categories: Uncategorized · Tags: ,

Up until this academic year, I used to hold workshops every week. The topics ranged from the practical (burning dvds and cds) to the esoteric (the philosophy of open source software). At first, the sessions were well attended. At their peak, I had as many as 25 people attending. Most of the people coming to my workshops were staff but there were always a handful of faculty. I wanted to reach more faculty, so I started gearing topics specifically to faculty, focusing on curriculum or classroom issues. Attendance dropped dramatically until one day, I was offering a workshop on podcasting and no one showed up, not even the people who’d signed up. I retooled my strategy and began covering a topic every week and offering one-on-one assistance for those interested in the topic. I got a flood of responses and scheduled one or two sessions, but the logistics soon became impossible to manage. And certain topics were more popular than others. Then, I scheduled targeted workshops, only two, at the request of specific faculty. At each of those, I had about 6 people, a good turnout in my mind. Still, 6 faculty out of 150 is not a good percentage.

I’ve become disenchanted with workshops.

But workshops can be an efficient way to convey information. There are two main reasons I’ve held workshops–to provide instruction on things that I’ve been asked about and to introduce ideas that may be useful to faculty. That first reason is an openly selfish attempt to reduce my own workload. Providing instruction on Blackboard, for example, may head off a certain amount of questions and requests for one-on-one tutorials. Imagine, if you will, if instead of having a class full of students all taking Introduction to Literature, you had to meet with each one of them individually according to their schedule and teach them. Each meeting with each student would go over the same material. That is, essentially, what I do at times.

There’s a saying that often gets invoked when discussing the lack of faculty interest in workshops: “just in time and just for me.” It’s getting more and more difficult to provide that kind of support as more and more people want it. One way to meet this need without going crazy is to provide online tutorials and faqs and other documentation and that’s something I’ve done something with. I believe a fair amount of it gets used, but I need more. And the software changes and so I still have to keep up with it.

And what I really want to do is to get away from spending so much time on the how to and spend more time discussing the why. Why use a blog at all? In what ways can it be effective? What aspects of Blackboard can be used to support student learning? How might I use video or audio effectively in my class? I know that knowing how to is an important first step to getting to these questions, but I also think too many people think that if they know how to, they’ll figure out the rest later. Increasingly, there’s nothing to the how to and there’s a lot to figuring out the best way to use the various tools. I know a lot of people think about and figure out these things on their own and don’t need me to help them think through such issues. I’m still struggling with how to reach those that do.

“Mr. Bush said his veto threat would apply to any measures that ‘allow taxpayer dollars to be used for the destruction of human life.’”

And the war is funded how? And the soldiers who died? Are they aliens? Non-human? And the civilians who die every day in that war? Not human?

I’ve posted an update on the hd-dvd code incident on my other blog and my thoughts about why educators (really, everyone) should be paying attention.

Tags: , ,
01. May 2007 · Write a comment · Categories: Uncategorized · Tags: ,

Remember what I said yesterday about content owners making it harder for people like me to circumvent copy protections and DRM in order to legally copy something for fair use purposes? Okay maybe you didn’t get that far. For those who don’t know, the new blu-ray and hd-dvd’s have stronger copy protection. The minute they came out, however, hackers cracked the protection scheme and have posted instructions all over the internet. A couple of weeks ago, Google received a takedown notice for the key that allows someone to copy hd-dvds. The key itself is contained in the takedown notice so now the whole internet has this key. This morning as I was perusing my feeds, which include a collection of technorati tags such as “dmca” and “copyright,” I noticed this key is everywhere. A search on technorati reveals probably hundreds of blogs posting this key. Can they issue takedown notices for all of them? Is it really worth it? Maybe they should give up? I find the whole thing amusing.
Update: There’s now a t-shirt.